This site provides permanent public access to the complete filings, appendices, and procedural records for U.S. Supreme Court Petitions No. 18-9663 and No. 20-354 filed by Lorcan T. Kilroy. It also hosts 2026 POST Commission complaint materials concerning the 2015 LAUSD Student Safety Investigation Team (SSIT) report at Millikan Middle School (now Louis Armstrong Middle School) and related matters.
### Supreme Court Petitions
- **Petition No. 18-9663** – In re Lorcan Kilroy
- **Petition No. 20-354** – In re Lorcan Kilroy
These petitions raised questions concerning the Ninth Circuit’s handling of the underlying cases, including issues of alleged political bias, Loudermill due-process standards, and the review of summary-judgment records.
1. Did Democratic political bias exist in the Ninth Circuit’s handling of *USCA9 No. 19-55357* to shield then-Senator Kamala Harris from potential criminal exposure—bias serious enough to justify an order directing non-California-based federal law enforcement to investigate alleged criminal obstruction that the circuit judges ignored?
2. Did Democratic political bias exist in *USCA9 No. 19-55357* to protect then-Senator Kamala Harris—bias sufficient to require the case to be reheard in a different circuit?
3. When a public employee with a property interest is terminated, does the Ninth Circuit’s approval of indefinite deprivation of all pay—imposed well before the pre-termination hearing offered as satisfying *Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill*—comply with the due-process standards established by the U.S. Supreme Court in *Loudermill*?
4. Does evidence that the Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment without reviewing the “Statement of Uncontroverted Material Facts” and the corresponding “Objections and Statements of Dispute” satisfy the standards set by the U.S. Supreme Court for proper consideration of the summary-judgment record?
**Additional Context Regarding Supreme Court Petitions 18-9663 and 20-354**
After the Ninth Circuit was allegedly influenced by a personal connection of then-Senator Kamala Harris (a friend and fellow sports-event attendee), the case was assigned to Justice Elena Kagan. The SCOTUS record is that Justice Kagan allowed Petition No. 18-9663 to reach the cert pool, where staff of conservative Justices reportedly declined to review or weigh it. Petition No. 20-354 appears to have been blocked from the cert pool altogether by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Kagan’s unusual personal denial (rather than a routine clerk decision) of a valid Pro Se time-extension motion, No. 19A492.
### 2026 POST Complaints
**(a) Complaint concerning former LASPD Detective Ray Jordan and the 2015 SSIT report**
Materials related to the administrative investigation conducted at Millikan Middle School on and after October 6, 2015, including the Ray Jordan declaration, the SSIT Fact Sheet and Case Summary, the question of the missing “Page 11 of 11,” student/parent declarations, room-layout sketches, and related correspondence.
**(b) Complaint concerning the 2012 Van Nuys High School incident (LAPD DR 12-09-11015)**
Materials related to the investigation and subsequent reviews of the April 20, 2012 classroom incident.
Former students or staff with relevant information are invited to contact FBI Special Agent Chad Yarbrough at chad.yarbrough@ic.fbi.gov.
### Key Documents
- POST Complaint against former LASPD Detective Ray Jordan (pending)
- Declaration of Ray Jordan and attached SSIT Report (Exhibit F) (pending)
- Supporting declarations and correspondence
- Supreme Court Petition No. 20-354 and related filings
- Supreme Court Petition No. 18-9663 and related filings
All materials on this site are provided for public access and transparency.
---